The question is this, Is this a mother's love or is it a mother in complete denial? I have to admit I think it is the latter. Nobody saw this coming I am pretty sure. The prosecution must have been dumbfounded by Cindy Anthony's testimony today in court. They never saw it coming. Every one thought Cindy's testimony was going to be a complete yawn fest. She never mentioned conducting any of the online chlorophyll searches in her depositions. This is a vital piece of the prosecution's case. And boy does she have some great explanations for performing those searches. All 84 times that the term chlorophyll was searched, Cindy claims those were done for health reasons for her pet dogs. She was afraid her dogs were being poisoned by eating bamboo plants that contained chlorophyll. While searching for chlorophyll the queries for chloroform were found in the searches. The prosecution is trying to prove that the t0t-mom drugged her kid with chloroform to knock her out.
I mean some could surmise that lying runs in the family. We all know that Casey is one. But wait is she telling the truth. Was she honest when she emphatically stated in her deposition that she did not search for info for chlorophyll online. We know she is still a liar after all she had a make believe nanny as well as a made up job. Now it is alleged that the father is also a pathological liar. So it would follow that the mother could also be somewhat of a fantasist. We all know a mother's love is a beautiful thing but this is damn near twisted.
Despite the allegations that the tot mom is leveling on Cindy's husband. She is willing to go to all sorts of lengths to save her daughter from a lethal injection. I guess I shouldn't be that surprised though. Remember when she was testifying last week and she walked back to her seat while mouthing the words "I love you" to tot-mom. So again is this love or denial. Will Cindy Anthony save her daughter. Not only did Cindy say that she performed the searches of chlorophyll and not the tot-mom. But further on in her testimony she attempted to debunk the prosecution's theory that the stain in the trunk was present when they bought the car in 2,000. The prosecution is asserting that the stain was a result of Caylee being stored in the trunk. YUK!
No comments:
Post a Comment